{"id":9038,"date":"2023-09-28T15:57:31","date_gmt":"2023-09-28T19:57:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=9038"},"modified":"2023-09-28T16:46:55","modified_gmt":"2023-09-28T20:46:55","slug":"decision-in-r-v-hafizi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/decision-dans-laffaire-r-hafizi\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9cision dans l\u2019affaire R c. Hafizi"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Le 28 septembre 2023, la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario a rendu sa d\u00e9cision dans l'affaire R contre Hafizi<\/em>, une affaire qui examinait la norme minimale de preuve requise pour que les forces de l'ordre utilisent des techniques de surveillance hautement invasives sur des individus qui ne sont pas la cible r\u00e9elle de l'enqu\u00eate mais sont simplement des \u00ab personnes connues \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Les \u00e9coutes t\u00e9l\u00e9phoniques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnues par la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada comme un type de fouille tr\u00e8s intrusif. En permettant \u00e0 l'\u00c9tat d'enregistrer des conversations priv\u00e9es, les \u00e9coutes t\u00e9l\u00e9phoniques portent atteinte au droit \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e au plus haut niveau et courent ainsi le risque de violer l'article 8 de la loi. Charte<\/em>, qui garantit le \u00ab droit d\u2019\u00eatre prot\u00e9g\u00e9 contre les perquisitions ou saisies abusives \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Il est \u00e9tabli depuis longtemps que, pour \u00e9viter Charte <\/em>En cas d\u2019infraction, le seuil de d\u00e9ploiement de technologies de surveillance, telles que les \u00e9coutes t\u00e9l\u00e9phoniques, doit \u00eatre en corr\u00e9lation avec le niveau d\u2019intrusion dans la vie priv\u00e9e de l\u2019individu. Par cons\u00e9quent, compte tenu de leur nature hautement intrusive, on pourrait s\u2019attendre \u00e0 ce que le seuil de d\u00e9ploiement de la technologie d\u2019\u00e9coute \u00e9lectronique soit \u00e9lev\u00e9. Pourtant, quand R contre Mahal <\/em>s'est retrouv\u00e9e devant la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario en 2012, la Cour a abaiss\u00e9 le seuil d'\u00e9coute \u00e9lectronique pour les \u00ab personnes connues \u00bb, d\u00e9clarant que la police pouvait obtenir des \u00e9coutes t\u00e9l\u00e9phoniques sur des personnes non cibl\u00e9es dans ses enqu\u00eates, \u00e0 condition qu'elle estime que cela \u00ab\u00a0peut aider\u00a0\u00bb leur enqu\u00eate principale.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC estime qu'il s'agit non seulement d'une d\u00e9rogation au pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent \u00e9tabli, mais \u00e9galement d'une violation des droits garantis par l'article 8 de la Charte<\/em>. Dans R contre Hafizi<\/em>, l'ACLC l'a soutenu, affirmant que la norme de preuve de Mahal<\/em>\u2014 une norme de preuve en cause dans la pr\u00e9sente affaire \u2014 viole encore une fois l\u2019art. 8 des Charte<\/em>. L'ACLC a \u00e9galement fait valoir que cette norme permettra des atteintes encore plus importantes \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e gr\u00e2ce aux nouvelles technologies, telles que les outils d'enqu\u00eate int\u00e9gr\u00e9s aux appareils (ODIT).<\/p>\n

Malheureusement, la Cour a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de rejeter l'appel et d'ent\u00e9riner le Mahal<\/em> norme pour les \u00e9coutes t\u00e9l\u00e9phoniques.<\/p>\n

Lire le m\u00e9moire de l'ACLC ici.<\/a><\/p>\n

Lire la d\u00e9cision de la CSC ici.<\/a><\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, et\u00a0Twitter<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Le 28 septembre 2023, la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario a rendu sa d\u00e9cision dans l'affaire R c. Hafizi, qui examinait la norme de preuve minimale requise pour que les forces de l'ordre...","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":4652,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[153,11,89],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-9038","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-device-searches","8":"category-privacy","9":"category-search-seizure"},"yoast_head":"\nDecision in R v Hafizi - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decision in R v Hafizi - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/decision-dans-laffaire-r-hafizi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-28T19:57:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-28T20:46:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Konikoff\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Konikoff\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/\",\"name\":\"Decision in R v Hafizi - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-28T19:57:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-28T20:46:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/82369f791926c019c73d528eeed3078f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"PRIVACY\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/category\/privacy\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Decision in R v Hafizi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/82369f791926c019c73d528eeed3078f\",\"name\":\"Daniel Konikoff\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/author\/daniel\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decision in R v Hafizi - CCLA","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decision in R v Hafizi - CCLA","og_url":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/decision-dans-laffaire-r-hafizi\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2023-09-28T19:57:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-28T20:46:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Daniel Konikoff","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Daniel Konikoff","Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/","url":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/","name":"Decision in R v Hafizi - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg","datePublished":"2023-09-28T19:57:31+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-28T20:46:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/82369f791926c019c73d528eeed3078f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/SS_security-on-mobile-phone-K3PCKG3.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/privacy\/decision-in-r-v-hafizi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PRIVACY","item":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/category\/privacy\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Decision in R v Hafizi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/82369f791926c019c73d528eeed3078f","name":"Daniel Konikoff","url":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/author\/daniel\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9038"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9046,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9038\/revisions\/9046"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}